What does DDP import in the Netherlands mean?
DDP import in the Netherlands means the seller delivers the goods cleared for import to the buyer. DDP stands for Delivered Duty Paid and gives the seller the highest level of responsibility under the Incoterms rules.
For the seller, this normally includes:
transport to the agreed delivery place in the Netherlands;
export formalities in the country of dispatch;
import customs formalities with Dutch Customs;
customs duties;
import VAT, unless a deferment mechanism applies;
customs representative fees;
risk until delivery at the agreed place.
For the buyer, DDP is comfortable: the goods arrive without the buyer managing customs clearance. For the seller, it is a strong commercial promise and a customs/VAT commitment.
DDP never replaces a VAT analysis. It allocates costs and risks between seller and buyer, but it does not decide who can act as importer, who can recover import VAT or who must register for VAT in the Netherlands.
Why does DDP trigger Dutch VAT obligations?
The DDP seller often becomes the tax operator of the flow because it takes control of the import. If the seller imports the goods into the Netherlands before a local sale, storage, transfer or onward EU supply, Dutch VAT must be secured from the customs entry onwards.
The usual control points are:
obtaining or using a Dutch VAT number;
using an EORI number consistent with the importer role;
appearing correctly in the import declaration;
paying or deferring Dutch import VAT;
reporting Dutch domestic sales in the BTW return;
reporting intra-Community supplies if the goods move from the Netherlands to another EU Member State;
keeping invoices, transport evidence, MRNs and customs documents.
Dutch VAT is called BTW. The standard VAT rate is 21% and the main reduced rate is 9%. The applicable rate depends on the goods, but the decisive point is the flow: local sale, stockholding, transfer or intra-EU resale.
Who can be importer of record under DDP?
The importer must be able to carry the customs and VAT obligations attached to the declaration. This is often where DDP sales break down, especially when the seller is not established in the European Union.
| Seller position | DDP control point |
| EU-established company | Direct customs representation may be possible if the mandate and importer data are correct |
| Non-EU company | Indirect customs representation is often required to create a workable import chain |
| Foreign company with a Dutch VAT number | Useful for VAT, but not enough if the customs role is not accepted |
| Dutch buyer refusing to be importer | The seller must organise representation before shipment |
The declarant, customs representative, importer and consignee are not interchangeable. Dutch Customs recognises direct and indirect customs representation, and each option changes who carries responsibility on the customs declaration.
Before promising DDP, ask the freight forwarder who will be named as importer on the customs declaration. If that answer arrives after the goods have left, the risk is already too far down the chain.
Procedure 40 00: import then sell in the Netherlands
Procedure 40 00 is the standard import scenario: the goods are released for free circulation and consumption in the Netherlands. It applies when the goods remain in the Netherlands for storage or sale after import.
Example: a German company imports shoes into the Netherlands, stores them in a Dutch warehouse, then sells them to Dutch B2B or B2C customers.
In that scenario:
the company generally needs a Dutch VAT registration;
customs duties are due based on tariff classification and origin;
Dutch import VAT is due at clearance unless Article 23 applies;
local sales are reported in the Dutch BTW return;
import VAT may be deducted if the right to deduct exists.
Without Article 23, the seller pays import VAT at customs and recovers it later through the VAT return. On recurring flows, this cash-flow gap quickly becomes material.
Article 23: deferring Dutch import VAT
Article 23 allows Dutch import VAT to be reported in the periodic VAT return instead of being paid immediately to customs. In operational terms, it is the Dutch import VAT deferment mechanism.
The Belastingdienst indicates that a foreign entrepreneur cannot apply for an Article 23 licence directly. In practice, the foreign company works through a fiscal representative:
with general fiscal representation, the representative may apply for an Article 23 licence for the foreign business;
with limited fiscal representation, the business may in some cases use the representative's own Article 23 licence, depending on the structure and flow.
Article 23 does not remove VAT. It removes the pre-financing. VAT due and deductible VAT are handled in the Dutch periodic VAT return.
| Without Article 23 | With Article 23 |
| Import VAT paid at customs | Import VAT reported in the BTW return |
| Immediate cash-flow impact | Possible neutrality in the same return if input VAT is deductible |
| Later VAT recovery | Simultaneous reporting treatment |
| Easier to understand | More demanding on fiscal representation and compliance |
Article 23 is powerful, but it needs a clean setup. A foreign company must deal with fiscal representation before import, not after the freight forwarder has issued a blocked customs invoice.
Procedure 42 00: import then supply within the EU
Procedure 42 00 is used when goods are imported into the Netherlands and then supplied or transferred to another EU Member State. It can avoid Dutch import VAT payment when the goods genuinely leave the Netherlands after import under the correct documentary conditions.
Example: a Czech company imports furniture into the Netherlands, then sells the goods to VAT-taxable customers in other Member States or transfers the stock to its warehouse in Czechia.
The procedure needs strong documentation:
Dutch VAT number or suitable representation;
VAT number of the recipient in the other Member State;
proof that the goods leave the Netherlands;
consistency between import declaration, invoice and transport;
reporting of the intra-Community supply;
follow-up in VAT returns, EC Sales List and supporting records.
The source file flags a short operational exit window after import. Treat that point as something to validate with the declarant and freight forwarder before shipment, because procedure 42 00 does not tolerate approximate flows.
Direct and indirect customs representation
Non-EU companies must validate customs representation early. A Dutch VAT number or tax representative in the Netherlands does not automatically solve the importer role on the customs declaration.
| Mode | How it works | Main risk |
| Direct representation | The representative acts in the name and on behalf of the importer | The seller must be eligible to be represented properly |
| Indirect representation | The representative acts in its own name but on behalf of the seller | The representative carries heavier liability, so acceptance must be confirmed |
Indirect representation is common when a non-EU seller wants to appear in the import chain without an EU establishment. It must be agreed before shipment, because not every freight forwarder accepts that role or accepts it for every product category.
Separate the roles. The fiscal representative secures VAT. The customs representative lodges or supports the customs declaration. The carrier delivers. When one provider says "we handle everything", I always ask for the exact mandate.
Advantages and limits of DDP in the Netherlands
DDP is commercially attractive, but it moves complexity to the seller. It reassures the Dutch customer and makes pricing easier to read, but it increases exposure to customs costs, VAT errors and administrative friction.
| DDP advantage | What the seller must control |
| Clear landed price for the customer | Duties, VAT and service fees included in the margin |
| Smooth buyer experience | Seller carries the formalities |
| Better logistics control | Freight, customs and tax coordination |
| Easier access to Dutch customers | Possible BTW registration and representation |
| Less commercial friction | Risk of blockage if the importer role is unclear |
DDP works well when flows are recurring, products are correctly classified, customs value is under control and the VAT route is validated. It works badly when the seller discovers Article 23, indirect representation or procedure 42 00 at the time of clearance.
After import: BTW returns, EC Sales List and Intrastat
Import is only the first compliance step. Once the goods are cleared, the following movement must be reported correctly: local sale, stock transfer, intra-Community supply or warehousing.
| Obligation | When it matters |
| Dutch VAT return | Import, local sales, Article 23 reporting, input VAT deduction |
| EC Sales List | B2B intra-Community supplies from the Netherlands |
| Intrastat | Physical intra-EU movements above 800 000 € for arrivals or 1 000 000 € for dispatches |
| Customs archiving | MRN, import declaration, invoice, transport evidence, customs value support |
Intrastat does not apply to the non-EU import itself. It becomes relevant if the goods then move between the Netherlands and another EU Member State.
Need help with DDP import in the Netherlands?
Eurofiscalis supports foreign companies selling DDP in the Netherlands before the first customs blockage happens.
Our team reviews the VAT scenario, Dutch registration, fiscal representation, Article 23 access, the choice between 40 00 and 42 00, and the consistency of post-import declarations. See our guide on the VAT return in the Netherlands and our overview of VAT rules in the Netherlands.
See also: international transport VAT rules · Dutch taxpayer portal
FAQ
Can I sell DDP in the Netherlands without a Dutch VAT number?
Sometimes, but it is not the usual case. If the seller imports goods into the Netherlands, stores them there or makes local sales, a Dutch VAT number is often required. The answer depends on the importer role, the sale flow and the customs procedure used.
Does DDP force the seller to pay import VAT in the Netherlands?
Commercially, DDP puts duties and taxes on the seller. For VAT, Dutch import VAT may be paid at customs or deferred through Article 23 if the conditions are met. Without Article 23, the seller must finance the import VAT before recovery.
What is Article 23 in the Netherlands?
Article 23 is the Dutch mechanism that allows import VAT to be reported in the VAT return instead of being paid at customs. For a foreign company, it usually requires general fiscal representation or, in some cases, limited fiscal representation.
Can a foreign company apply for Article 23 itself?
The Belastingdienst states that a foreign entrepreneur cannot apply directly for an Article 23 licence. The foreign business can appoint a fiscal representative, who applies for the licence or allows use of its own arrangement depending on the representation model.
What is the difference between procedure `40 00` and procedure `42 00`?
Procedure 40 00 covers import and release for consumption in the Netherlands, often followed by a local sale or stockholding. Procedure 42 00 covers import followed by an intra-Community supply or transfer to another Member State, with proof that the goods leave the Netherlands.
Can a non-EU company be importer under DDP in the Netherlands?
It must validate the structure with a customs representative first. Indirect customs representation is often needed because the representative acts in its own name but on behalf of the non-EU company. Some freight forwarders refuse this role or limit it to specific goods.
Do I need Intrastat after a DDP import into the Netherlands?
Intrastat does not cover the import from a non-EU country itself. It can become relevant if the goods subsequently move between the Netherlands and another EU Member State and the thresholds 800 000 € or 1 000 000 € are exceeded.
What is the main DDP risk in the Netherlands?
The main risk is selling "all duties and taxes included" without securing the importer role, customs representation, Article 23 and Dutch VAT reporting. The issue then appears at clearance, with storage costs, delivery delays and commercial disputes.
Countries concerned